|
Student
Religious Group Recognition
Decision of the Tufts University Committee on Student
Life on Recognition of Student Religious Groups
December 5, 2012
This Fall, the decision of the Tufts Community Union
Judiciary (TCUJ) to de-recognize the Tufts Christian
Fellowship (TCF) was appealed to the Committee on
Student Life (CSL). As expected, this matter has
received significant attention. The CSL has considered
the issues seriously and has reached a unanimous
decision.
Regarding the specific
question of whether the TCUJ acted inappropriately, we
find no significant fault with the TCUJ. No human
process is perfect, and while variation across decision
processes should be minimized, it is our finding that
the TCUJ followed its policy correctly in de-recognizing
the TCF. As such, TCF’s appeal is declined.
TCF’s appeal, however, has
demonstrated that the TCUJ process for student group
recognition has not previously addressed the issue of
leadership characteristics for student religious groups
(SRGs). Accordingly, the CSL is filling this policy
void. These changes are made in the context of TCF’s
appeal, but will impact all student religious groups
within the jurisdiction of the TCUJ seeking recognition
and re-recognition from this point forward.
The CSL Ruling:
Membership: SRGs must uphold and adhere to the
University’s full nondiscrimination policy (sometimes
referred to as an "all comers" policy) with respect to
group membership.
This reflects no change in current policy.
Leadership: It is reasonable to expect that leaders
within individual SRGs be exemplars of that particular
religion. Therefore, an "all comers" policy for group
leadership may not be appropriate for all SRGs.
Justified departures from the Tufts nondiscrimination
policy in SRG criteria for leadership will no longer
present grounds for de-recognition.
This reflects a policy change.
Transparency: To ensure that all potential SRG members are aware of specific
requirements for leadership, all SRGs must explicitly
state and justify any leadership criteria that are in
conflict with Tufts’ nondiscrimination policy, the
relevant portion of which reads as follows:
"Tufts prohibits discrimination
against and harassment of any [individual] because of
race, color, national or ethnic origin, age, religion,
disability, sex, sexual orientation, gender, gender
identity and expression, including a transgender
identity, genetics, veteran status...and any other
characteristic protected...under applicable federal or
state law."
If adherence to a particular set of
religious beliefs is to be a criterion for leadership,
this must be clearly stated.
Additionally, if
religious doctrine specifically requires any further
leadership criteria that necessitate one or more
exceptions to Tufts’ nondiscrimination policy–such as
ones that might be based on gender, sexual orientation
or other categories–they must be explicitly stated and
justified in
SRG
constitutions and applications for recognition (and
re-recognition) by the TCUJ. Furthermore, this
information must be easily obtained by any interested
community members (e.g., summarized on the Chaplain’s
official web site).
This reflects a policy change.
Oversight: To ensure transparency, the University
Chaplaincy will review for accuracy and appropriate
doctrinal justification all departures from the Tufts
nondiscrimination policy required for any SRG leadership
positions. The TCUJ will not review applications for
recognition or re-recognition until after the University
Chaplain has ensured complete and accurate doctrinal
justification. This
reflects a policy change.
De-recognition: De-recognition of a SRG is an appropriate
response by the TCUJ if
a religious group
violates the nondiscrimination policy when an exception
has not previously been approved on doctrinal grounds by
the University Chaplain and/or if the student group has
not been fully transparent (e.g., by using vague
language instead of explicit statements). The University
Chaplain should be consulted in SRG de-recognition
decisions. This
reflects a policy change.
The immediate outcome for the TCF is that the TCF will
remain conditionally recognized while they prepare a new
recognition application under these new guidelines. The
TCF has 60 days from this decision to reapply for
recognition.

Back to Pachyderm Index
|